| To: | William L Jones <jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Should open_by_inode have a special dentry ops? |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:51:58 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from William L Jones <jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> of "Wed, 13 Sep 2000 20:24:32 CDT." <200009140124.UAA08447@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > > Shouldn't open_by_inode have a dentry_operations table like the one found in xfs_iops.c? > I think it should. This may be the source of the reference leak that was noti ced > after using xfxdump. > > If it does, doesn't that indicate that their may be problems exporting a xfs file system > in linux. NFS also creates its own dentries from inodes gained by iget? > > > Bill Jones You may have a point here, if we do not go into the vnode layer when dropping the reference count it will fail to call the xfs inactive code. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | PARTIAL TAKE 795642 - remount -o remount,ro doesn't leave FS consistent, lord@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE -, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Should open_by_inode have a special dentry ops?, William L Jones |
| Next by Thread: | BUG 801763 - freed kmem modified on log mount failure, dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |