xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Should open_by_inode have a special dentry ops?

To: William L Jones <jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Should open_by_inode have a special dentry ops?
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:51:58 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from William L Jones <jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> of "Wed, 13 Sep 2000 20:24:32 CDT." <200009140124.UAA08447@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> Shouldn't open_by_inode have a dentry_operations table like the one found in 
xfs_iops.c?
> I think it should. This may be the source of the reference leak that was noti
ced
> after using xfxdump.
> 
> If it does, doesn't that indicate that their may be problems exporting a xfs 
file system
> in linux.   NFS also creates its own dentries from inodes gained by iget?
> 
> 
> Bill Jones


You may have a point here, if we do not go into the vnode layer when dropping 
the
reference count it will fail to call the xfs inactive code.

Steve


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>