| To: | "Davida, Joe" <Joe_Davida@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2 Terabyte File System Size Limitation |
| From: | "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Sep 2000 14:19:36 +0200 |
| Cc: | "'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <09D1E9BD9C30D311919200A0C9DD5C2C02536F84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Joe_Davida@xxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 03:44:34PM -0600 |
| References: | <09D1E9BD9C30D311919200A0C9DD5C2C02536F84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 03:44:34PM -0600, Davida, Joe wrote: > Is there any information on the 2 TBytes file system > limitation in Linux which is also inherited by the > linux port of xfs? What imposes this limitation? > Are the current efforts aimed at removing this > limitation? I hear ReiserFS has a 16 Terabyte > file system size. The 2TB limitation is caused by the interface between block drivers and file systems. On 32bit machines a 32bit value is used to pass the sector number, with the sector being in 512byte units. Limiting yourself to 31bits is probably safer to protect against signedness bugs in the driver. That gives you a 2^31 * 2^9 = 2^40bits block device size limit for all file systems and raw devices. On 64bit systems the limit is higher, assuming there are no 32bit limitations in the driver. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - stress/xfsdump, Tim Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2 Terabyte File System Size Limitation, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE - stress/xfsdump, Tim Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2 Terabyte File System Size Limitation, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |