| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: smp and xfs / crash |
| From: | Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 25 Aug 2000 17:59:03 GMT |
| Distribution: | local |
| Organization: | innominate AG, Berlin, Germany |
| References: | <news2mail-8o65ao$o3g$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-8o65mc$o3g$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-8o66e1$7ip$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Thomas Graichen <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.16-local (i586)) |
Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ok - all back - looks like the mkfs was not old enough - it was > one of those buggy non sim mkfs ... will remake the fs with the > real old and working one now ... so don't care for this until > i tested this (btw. it happend on up too - so i looked again > better at the mkfs.xfs used ...) ok - it was the mkfs.xfs - re-mkfs'ed it and it now works fine ... sorry for the false alarm have a nice weekend t -- thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx technical director innominate AG clustering & security networking people tel: +49.30.308806-13 fax: -77 http://innominate.de |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: smp and xfs / crash, Thomas Graichen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: smp and xfs / crash, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: smp and xfs / crash, Thomas Graichen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: smp and xfs / crash, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |