xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs after a week of use

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfs after a week of use
From: Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 7 Aug 2000 19:50:01 GMT
Distribution: local
Organization: innominate AG, Berlin, Germany
References: <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200008071824.NAA23314@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Thomas Graichen <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs-announce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.16-local (i586))
Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>> > Looks like this:
>> > 
>> > mount -n -o remount,ro /
>> > 
>> > Which will not look like a clean shutdown when we remount an XFS filesystem
> .
>> > 
>> ... which proves to be right here :-)
>> 
>> how it should perfectly look like for xfs ?
>> 

> At the moment I think it needs code changes, XFS expects to get unmounted
> by the kernel shutdown code - which is not happening in Linux. There is a
> partially working patch in my mailbox somewhere, maybe it is time to finish
> it.

ho yes :-) ... just let me know whenever you have something to test

>> 
>> p.s.: is there any XFS faq so far (oss.sgi.com says "not available
>>       yet") - if not i may start one - because looks like it's needed
>>       now that more people start testing xfs
>> 

> No, there are little bits and pieces scattered around the place, currently
> we have bandwidth problems around here so we have been ignoring it.....

ok - i'll try to look into this too ...

t

-- 
thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
technical director                                       innominate AG
clustering & security                                networking people
tel: +49.30.308806-13  fax: -77                   http://innominate.de

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>