Re: xfs after a week of use

[Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> One comment here - the lost+found directory is removed by xfs_repair,
> so if you run repair and it reconnects some files, then running repair
> again without moving those files somewhere else will result in them
> getting reconnected again.

so it is a bit different in this aspect to a classic ufs - right
(or this does no longer cry about it) ... but i'm now really
convinced - i think it connects lost inodes to lost+found
but the second run they are connected and don't need to
be reconnected again - do i miss anything here ?

t

-- 
thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
technical director                                       innominate AG
clustering & security                                networking people
tel: +49.30.308806-13  fax: -77                   http://innominate.de