| To: | "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: latest cvs checkout and lvm |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 07 Aug 2000 12:24:15 -0500 |
| Cc: | jphollan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Linux-XFS" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Message from "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> of "07 Aug 2000 12:32:41 EDT." <yq1lmy9owuu.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs-announce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> >>>>> "Jason" == Jason Holland <jphollan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Jason> has anyone had any luck using the latest cvs tree (2.4.0-test5) > Jason> with lvm enabled?? i had a few test volume groups setup, and > Jason> wanted to test out xfs. however, i get a core dump when i do a > Jason> vgscan with the xfs-enabled kernel running > > Our tree adds a few fields to /proc/partitions that causes liblvm to > barf. Just in case anyone wonders what these are, it is actually Stephen Tweedie's sard patch which lets you get better statistics out of the block device layer. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - build, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs after a week of use, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: latest cvs checkout and lvm, Martin K. Petersen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: latest cvs checkout and lvm, William L. Jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |