xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs_iget...

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs_iget...
From: Daniel Moore <dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:17:43 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Aug 2000 14:18:08 EST." <200008281918.OAA24273@jen.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Steve Lord writes:

 => I suspect what you are seeing is due to running fsstress - it exercises
 => the bulkstat interface asking for random inode numbers - which in all
 => probability do not exist. It calculates a disk location based on the inode
 => number and reads the block into memory - it fails these checks if it is
 => not a real inode block and you get the error message.
 => 
 => Irix exhibits exactly the same behavior with fsstress, this one is not a
 => bug it is a feature of the test program.

This confirms what I eventually worked out. I'll document this somewhere
useful and cross it off my list.

Thanks.

-----------------------------------------------------
 Daniel Moore                  dxm@xxxxxxx
 R&D Software Engineer         Phone: +61-3-98348209
 SGI Performance Tools Group   Fax:   +61-3-98132378
-----------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>