| To: | <jphollan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Linux-XFS" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: latest cvs checkout and lvm |
| From: | "William L. Jones" <jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 07 Aug 2000 12:42:10 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <NDBBKPLIMKJCOCFNKHBLOEDECOAA.jphollan@earthlink.net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs-announce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 06:22 PM 8/6/00 -0500, Jason Holland wrote:
has anyone had any luck using the latest cvs tree (2.4.0-test5) with lvm enabled?? i had a few test volume groups setup, and wanted to test out xfs. however, i get a core dump when i do a vgscan with the xfs-enabled kernel running, and vgchange -a y returns errors about /proc not being mounted and physical devices not found on the system. the vg's are fine as far as i can tell, booting with a xfs-disabled 2.4.0-test5 kernel works. any ideas or suggestions??? btw, i went ahead and recompiled all my lvm tools just in case. same problem occurred. The lvm has several bugs in the utility programs. Take a look at the LVM site http://linux.msede.com/lvm/. You might find some patches their. I also sent you a patch that I use that may fix your problem. Bill Jones |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs after a week of use, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs after a week of use, Thomas Graichen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: latest cvs checkout and lvm, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - make 64 bit division in XFS an explicit operation, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |