| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Possible xfs log problem |
| From: | "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Aug 2000 22:37:42 +0200 |
| Cc: | "William L. Jones" <jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200008031947.OAA11791@jen.americas.sgi.com>; from lord@sgi.com on Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 02:47:38PM -0500 |
| References: | <jones@tacc.cc.utexas.edu> <200008031947.OAA11791@jen.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs-announce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 02:47:38PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > Right, sorry for not getting back to you on this one - we still have work > to do in making XFS robust against memory failures, and in this case we > could just back off to a smaller buffer size and try again - the 128K buffer > is already half the size used on Irix. Can't you just use vmalloc for this case ? -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SGI XFS on ppc, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SGI XFS on ppc, Thomas Graichen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Possible xfs log problem, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - add xfs_dmapi glue to dmapi, Dean Roehrich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |