| To: | William L Jones <jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_mkfs |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Jul 2000 16:03:49 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from William L Jones <jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> of "Mon, 24 Jul 2000 15:50:43 CDT." <200007242050.PAA13077@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > Spoke too soon. I just crated a file system the would produce diffrent probl ems. > > I noticed the irix defaults to version 1 directories. A quick test on linux of a linux > xfs file system with version 1 directories and a block size 512 indcates that this > may be a workable combination. > > Has the xfs verion 2 directory code bee fully test? > > Bill Jones V2 directories are what we use exclusively internally - what is not tested and known not to work about your setup is using a filesystem with a blocksize other that the page size of the system (4 Kbytes). This is something which is still being worked on internally, so for the moment, try to stick to the default block size used by mkfs. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problem building kernel with XFS, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ADD 772830 - XFS on Linux needs standard dump and restore commands, Martin K. Petersen |
| Previous by Thread: | xfs_mkfs, William L Jones |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - minor pagebuf code cleanup, lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |