Re: Another bug in xfs

xfs

Re: Another bug in xfs_ioctl.c

To:	jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (William L Jones)
Subject:	Re: Another bug in xfs_ioctl.c
From:	Ted Kline <jtk@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:27:07 -0500 (CDT)
Cc:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200007202153.QAA24032@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "William L Jones" at Jul 20, 2000 04:53:02 PM
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

> 
> 
> 
> I keeped getting an EINVAL erro for XFS_IOC_RESVSP64.
> 
> This is do a difference in the way xfs_ioctl.c defines xfs_change_file_spce 
> as:
.
.
.
> off_t is smaller the xfs_off_t.  The cause XFS_IOC_RESVSP64 to return EINVAL.
> Changing the definition of xfs_change_file_space in xfs_ioctl.c to match that
> as xfs_vnodeops.c fixes the problem.
> 
> 
> Bill Jones
> 


Got it,

        Thanx, -Ted

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Another bug in xfs_ioctl.c, William L Jones Re: Another bug in xfs_ioctl.c, Ted Kline <=

Previous by Date:	TAKE - Fix a broken prototype in xfs_ioctl.c, Ted Kline
Next by Date:	TAKE - fix XFS_BUF_SUPER_STALE, lord
Previous by Thread:	Another bug in xfs_ioctl.c, William L Jones
Next by Thread:	my new address, marggie.k
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]