| To: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE - xfsdump |
| From: | "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Jul 2000 18:09:59 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <396DE3A6.658F07CD@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 10:43:35AM -0500 |
| References: | <200007130303.NAA13664@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20000713171043.A25082@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <396DE3A6.658F07CD@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 10:43:35AM -0500, Russell Cattelan wrote: > The team working on the dump code has asked that it not be pushed out to the > tree on oss until it is working. > > I'm not sure what difference it makes?! > If you really want to look at it? I'll look into getting it pushed out. I just wanted to look at the source and play a bit with it. And I suspected that the tree was out-of-date again. But when it is not working yet I can surely wait. Thanks for the clarification, -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE - xfsdump, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | REASSIGN 796140 - deadlock on unmount, lord@xxxxxxx |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE - xfsdump, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE - xfsdump, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |