Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan wrote:
> Russell Cattelan wrote:
>
> [ For some reason, you want to communicate thorough
> a slower mailing list. Keeping it on linux-xfs@oss ]
>
> >
> > Is the source file on disk corrupted or just cached buffer?
> > in other words if you unmount the file system and remount it is the source
> > file still
> > corrupted?
>
> Unmount removes some corruption, but not all of it.
Hmm ok that's a read path bug then...
Where would that be comming from I wonder?
>
>
> >
> > I haven't been able to get doio to corrupt... I know jim was running with 5
> > threads
> > successfully.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Are you running with only 64M of memory?
> >
> > no
>
> Why not? I think smaller memory configs reproduce
> corruption with greater probability. Can you atleast
> verify that you either see or don't see when you switch
> to smaller memory size?
Just haven't gotten that far yet.
OSS is taking a bit tim right now... we are trying to deply the new box by
monday.
|