xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - Corruption fix.

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: TAKE - Corruption fix.
From: Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan <ananth@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 14:59:11 -0700
References: <200005121849.NAA42742@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <391C55AE.AA03EBAA@xxxxxxx> <391C6667.5AAF4A80@xxxxxxxxxxx> <391C727D.FF6BE468@xxxxxxx> <391C7987.FF7DBD7F@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Russell Cattelan wrote:

[ For some reason, you want to communicate thorough
  a slower mailing list. Keeping it on linux-xfs@oss ]

> 
> Is the source file on disk corrupted or just cached buffer?
> in other words if you unmount the file system and remount it is the source 
> file still
> corrupted?

Unmount removes some corruption, but not all of it.

> 
> I haven't been able to get doio to corrupt... I know jim was running with 5 
> threads
> successfully.
> 
> >
> >
> > Are you running with only 64M of memory?
> 
> no


Why not? I think smaller memory configs reproduce
corruption with greater probability. Can you atleast
verify that you either see or don't see when you switch
to smaller memory size?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>