xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: compile errors

To: Andrew Park <apark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: compile errors
From: Kip Macy <kip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 09:40:44 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: Extended Solutions Inc.
References: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0004271205440.23546-100000@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Andrew Park wrote:
> 
> On 27 Apr 2000 suzukis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > > I have gcc version 2.7.2.3. Do I  need to upgrade?
> >
> > Yes, it's a bit too old to try SGI Linux kernel source.
> > Please try egcs-1.1.2. egcs-1.0.x can compile too,
> > but I recommend egcs-1.1.2.
> 
> Well, some may say that it is old, but gcc 2.7.2.3 IS the official
> compiler of the linux Kernel.  I (IMHO) think it is rather stupid if
> XFS wouldn't compile with the official linux kernel compiler.  I'd like to
> know the following then
> 
>         1.  Is SGI pushing to have XFS accepted into official linux kernel
>             sources?
> 
>         2.  If so, then why create extra work now, by having things that'll
>             break with official kernel compiler?
> 
>         3.  If not (of #1) what is SGI intending?



gcc-2.7.x is 5 years old. Redhat happily uses egcs-1.1.2 and it is a
safe bet 
that the community will go that way in the not too distant future.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>