| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE - Corruption fix. |
| From: | Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan <ananth@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 May 2000 14:59:11 -0700 |
| References: | <200005121849.NAA42742@nt8.americas.sgi.com> <391C55AE.AA03EBAA@sgi.com> <391C6667.5AAF4A80@thebarn.com> <391C727D.FF6BE468@sgi.com> <391C7987.FF7DBD7F@thebarn.com> |
| Reply-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Russell Cattelan wrote: [ For some reason, you want to communicate thorough a slower mailing list. Keeping it on linux-xfs@oss ] > > Is the source file on disk corrupted or just cached buffer? > in other words if you unmount the file system and remount it is the source > file still > corrupted? Unmount removes some corruption, but not all of it. > > I haven't been able to get doio to corrupt... I know jim was running with 5 > threads > successfully. > > > > > > > Are you running with only 64M of memory? > > no Why not? I think smaller memory configs reproduce corruption with greater probability. Can you atleast verify that you either see or don't see when you switch to smaller memory size? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE - Corruption fix., Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TAKE - Corruption fix., Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE - Corruption fix., Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE - Corruption fix., Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |