[Top] [All Lists]

Re: latest xfs source does not build / crash when mounting floppy (auto)

To: phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: latest xfs source does not build / crash when mounting floppy (auto)
From: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:25:14 -0500
Cc: ph_baer@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: In your message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2000 12:03:43 -0400" <20000418120343.F649@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10004171408240.3568-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <38FB812C.EAD536B7@xxxxxxx> <14587.35504.996144.26996Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <38FC24ED.DE067E84@xxxxxxx> <38FC6F00.81868428@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20000418120343.F649@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Wanderlust/1.0.3 (Notorious) tm/7.108 XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon)
At Tue, 18 Apr 2000 12:03:43 -0400,
Phil Schwan <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Apr 18, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> > Last night I was trying out the different builds trying find
> > out exactly why linux/fs.h got included in this file.
> > I could come with any case where it needed it.
> > 
> > Just go ahead and removed the NEED_FS_H line
> > I'll check this change in later today.
> We exchanged email about this last week--linux/fs.h contains the
> prototype for is_read_only(), used in xlog_recover in the read-only
> case.
That's what is was for... I couldn't remember wich function proto was

libsim needs to compile with the but_t macros, so even though we are
very close to using pagebuf meta data, the buf_t case need to compile.

I know this is a pain... the first month of porting was noting but
compiler errors.

I think I know to fix this... I'll give it a shot and let you know

> I wasn't aware that the non-pagebuf case was still being maintained,
> after Jim said that everyone should be using pagebuf.  Sorry about
> that.
> -Phil

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>