[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bug submission?

To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bug submission?
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:13:46 -0500
Cc: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: Message from "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx> of "Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:54:52 +0200." <20000411215452.A706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> fs/nfsfh/nfsfh.c does a lot of dirty things with the VFS, especially
> with inodes.  Especially iget()/read_inode() must handle the case of
> doing iget for an already deleted file.
> -Andi

You mean fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c of course,

Yes I think this will trip us up - our read_inode implementation needs work,
specifically xfs_get_vnode () needs to do an xfs_iget rather than assuming
the inode is already present in XFS'es internal hash table. Paying special
attention to the reference count code of course.... 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>