| To: | "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bug submission? |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:13:46 -0500 |
| Cc: | "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Message from "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx> of "Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:54:52 +0200." <20000411215452.A706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> fs/nfsfh/nfsfh.c does a lot of dirty things with the VFS, especially > with inodes. Especially iget()/read_inode() must handle the case of > doing iget for an already deleted file. > > > -Andi You mean fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c of course, Yes I think this will trip us up - our read_inode implementation needs work, specifically xfs_get_vnode () needs to do an xfs_iget rather than assuming the inode is already present in XFS'es internal hash table. Paying special attention to the reference count code of course.... Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 787178 - fix time updates, eliminate lots of corruptions., Jim Mostek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Bug submission?, Ian S. Nelson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bug submission?, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bug submission?, Ian S. Nelson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |