xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bug submission?

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bug submission?
From: "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:54:52 +0200
Cc: ian.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxxx, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200004111928.OAA31956@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from lord@xxxxxxx on Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 02:28:06PM -0500
References: <ian.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200004111928.OAA31956@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 02:28:06PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> 
> 
> I think the bug here is going to be a long way away from this code - there
> always should be an inode passed into pagebuf_get - the comment is wrong.
> The inode here is coming from the vnode passed in, where it should also
> always be set - I bet NFS is using a way into the filesystem to reference
> an inode which XFS is not setting things up properly, that is where to look.

fs/nfsfh/nfsfh.c does a lot of dirty things with the VFS, especially
with inodes.  Especially iget()/read_inode() must handle the case of
doing iget for an already deleted file.


-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>