| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bug submission? |
| From: | "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:54:52 +0200 |
| Cc: | ian.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxxx, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200004111928.OAA31956@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from lord@xxxxxxx on Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 02:28:06PM -0500 |
| References: | <ian.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200004111928.OAA31956@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 02:28:06PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > > > I think the bug here is going to be a long way away from this code - there > always should be an inode passed into pagebuf_get - the comment is wrong. > The inode here is coming from the vnode passed in, where it should also > always be set - I bet NFS is using a way into the filesystem to reference > an inode which XFS is not setting things up properly, that is where to look. fs/nfsfh/nfsfh.c does a lot of dirty things with the VFS, especially with inodes. Especially iget()/read_inode() must handle the case of doing iget for an already deleted file. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Bug submission?, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 787178 - fix time updates, eliminate lots of corruptions., Jim Mostek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bug submission?, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bug submission?, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |