[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS as Root filesystem

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS as Root filesystem
From: Lyle Seaman <lws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:49:20 -0400
Organization: Hah.
References: <200004051440.JAA25697@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <38EB8FEF.9CB411C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20000406162144.B14727@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > If that's the case, then why do you care?  Naively, I wouldn't
> > think this is a big deal.  Why am I wrong?
> Because (a) existing Linux installations expect to mount the
> root filesystem readonly until basic consistency checking has
> been done; and (b) after a cold reboot, the filesystem will
> need recovery before it can be mounted.

Ahhh.  Now I see.
The root fs  is *always* cycling back and forth
between read-write and read-only.    So after
nearly every crash, the root filesystem will be both
unstable (ie, potentially inconsistent) *and* RO.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>