| To: | Jim Mostek <mostek@xxxxxxx>, Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | thanks; more bad stuff 'bout bfd.h |
| From: | Jim Bray <jb@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 8 Apr 2000 07:06:58 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <38EE5C5A.21F36E90@thebarn.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi Jim and Russell, Thanks for trying to send bfd.h to me. God God, the thing is more than 100 K! If I had any idea, I wouldn't have asked. I just found it; my procmail script on as220 doesn't forward anything >100k to my ISP address. I just have a Bad Feeling about a piece of in-kernel code pulling some whonkin' huge machine-generated file from /usr/include in. If I am correct in assuming that the rest of the kernel doesn't do this, then this might (rightfully, IMHO) make acceptance of kdb unlikely. Jim http://as220.org/jb [Advertisement] "Y2K: Bringing The Past Into The Future Today" |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Maybe use caddr_t instead of bfd_vma?, Jim Bray |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 486 and Linux-2.3.99pre2+XFS, suzukis |
| Previous by Thread: | Still Missing bfd.h for kdb, Jim Bray |
| Next by Thread: | 486 and Linux-2.3.99pre2+XFS, suzukis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |