xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

CVS mirroring was Re: TAKE - fix xfs_zero_eof bug with sparse files

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: CVS mirroring was Re: TAKE - fix xfs_zero_eof bug with sparse files
From: Kip Macy <kmacy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 08:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200004040242.VAA86083@clink.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
When does the external CVS end up getting updated? The fix you mentioned below
is, as far as I can tell, still not visible. Thanks.


                                -Kip

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kip Macy                               kmacy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
University of California, Berkeley     
------------------------------------------------------------------------


On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Steve Lord wrote:

> xfs_zero_eof got reimplemnted with a nwe callign interface,
> but a couple of old calls remain. Fix it so that evryone
> speaks the same lingo. Thanks to Kip Macy for reporting
> this.
> 
> Modid:  2.3.99pre2-xfs:slinx:56556a
> Date:  Mon Apr  3 19:40:50 PDT 2000
> Workarea:  clink.americas.sgi.com:/data/clink/io/lord/slinx-xfs-2.3.99pre2
> 
> The following file(s) were checked into:
>   bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.3.99pre2-xfs
> 
> linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_lrw.c - 1.31
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/linux-2.4-xfs/> 
linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_lrw.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.31&r2=text&tr2=1.30&f=h
>       - Change xfs_zero_eof to take a vnode rather than an inode
>         so that all the callers pass it the same thing!
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>