xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Things todo before we announce

To: petro@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Things todo before we announce
From: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:56:11 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: In your message of "Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:40:08 -0800" <v0420550db50aa0afe071@[10.1.1.197]>
References: <200003291619.KAA22984@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mostek@xxxxxxx> <10003300954.ZM7142@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <14562.42090.314696.82332B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <10003301105.ZM7400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <14562.44287.39273.95483R@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <v0420550db50aa0afe071@[10.1.1.197]>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Wanderlust/1.0.3 (Notorious) tm/7.108 XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon)
At Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:40:08 -0800,
Christopher C. Petro <petro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> >At Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:05:54 -0500,
> >Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >The point I was getting at:
> >We shouldn't pollute the system with stuff people can't
> >distinctly remove;  not util xfs it more accecpted.
> >
> >A lot of people are going to try xfs initially but
> >not really do much with it.
> 
>       On the contrary, as soon as XFS is stable enough to use, I'm 
> going to put it on a development machine. We have this project where 
> we are working with about 10 million 2k files, some directories 
> having over 65k entries.

There is going to be ai lot of revisions between now and "stable"
Keeping things "sandboxed" for now will keep things cleaner.

Things will change as "stable" becomes a reality.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>