Kip Macy wrote:
> Is there any way for individuals to contribute prior to full legal review?
> Or are we best off just reviewing the code that has been released until the
> full
> release takes place?
The entire tree should be available very soon... week or two.
At this point it would be easiest just to wait a little bit longer.
I will make an announcement to the list when the rest of
the CVS tree is available.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Kip
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kip Macy kmacy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> University of California, Berkeley
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Jim Mostek wrote:
>
> > This is needed to truncate any pages left on the inode
> > at remove time.
> >
> > Modid: 2.3.42-xfs:slinx:46496a
> > Date: Mon Mar 20 15:44:51 PST 2000
> > Workarea: clink.americas.sgi.com:/data/clink/io/mostek/slinx-xfs2.3
> >
> > The following file(s) were checked into:
> > bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.3.42-xfs
> >
> > linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_super.c - 1.49
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/linux-2.4-xfs/> >
linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_super.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.49&r2=text&tr2=1.48&f=h
> > - Add delete_inode routine that does nothing.
> > While put_inode with vnodes does all the releasing, iput
> > keeps going (see fs/inode.c:iput).
> > If there is no delete_inode routine for a file system,
> > pages are not discarded when a file is removed that is no
> > longer referenced: i.e. the following is skipped:
> > if (inode->i_data.nrpages)
> > truncate_inode_pages(inode, 0);
> > This must be done on XFS so we need a dummy delete_inode routine.
> >
> >
|