xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the xfs tree

To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the xfs tree
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:01:48 +1100
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20111219151145.dba82854f65671a877db8ed3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20111219151145.dba82854f65671a877db8ed3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 03:11:45PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c between commit 687d1c5e8e26 ("xfs: remove unused
> XBT_FORCE_SLEEP bit") from the xfs tree and commit a0acae0e886d
> ("freezer: unexport refrigerator() and update try_to_freeze() slightly")
> from the pm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Looks correct from the XFS POV, Stephen. Thanks.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>