| To: | Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:30:21 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx>, aelder@xxxxxxx, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4E706A90.9080200@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1D2B34A7-7BB9-4E4E-9CA2-382C210E125F@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110912152133.GA8345@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C6515E45-5724-43DD-95A8-1F89AFE29601@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110912200543.GA22409@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E6EF274.7050007@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110913205018.GA8543@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E70571A.80108@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E705C42.6020909@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E706A90.9080200@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:49:20AM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > >Sadly it was now crashing with 3.1 rc-6 + patch again. Sorry i was to > >fast to write you an email. > > So might it be that the problem at least in 3.1 lies in: > [] ? mark_held_locks+0xc9/0xef > [] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47 > > and not in XFS? That's the lockdep code. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | targeted email lists in many different areas, dally Collins |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |