| To: | hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IMA and fs |
| From: | Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:20:20 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, david safford <safford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <11555.1239976666@jrobl> |
| References: | <15909.1239887985@jrobl> <OF1283DDC6.0AD2926E-ON8525759B.004938DD-8525759B.004A1887@xxxxxxxxxx> <11555.1239976666@jrobl> |
hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 04/17/2009 09:57:46 AM: > Mimi Zohar: > > > xfs_iget() holds spinlock before xfs_iget_cache_hit(), and > > > ima_inode_alloc() cannot use GFP_KERNEL. > > > > This looks similar to the xfs - IMA problem discussed > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/20/327. > > Yes, the same issue. > I didn't know it was discussed before. > So what is the conclusion? Are you waiting for fixing the spinlock in > xfs? Yes. I just assumed, incorrectly, the xfs maintainer was notified. Am copying the xfs maintainer now. > > > Does nfsd_open() need to to call ima_path_check()? > ::: > > Yes, in order for the open/free to be balanced in ima_file_free(). > > Then how about putting ima_path_check() into __dentry_open() instead of > may_open()? > > > J. R. Okajima Interesting. Am looking into it. Thanks! Mimi Zohar |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 819] New: 2.6.29.1: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1599, bugzilla-daemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | bad reference to CONFIG_XFS_TRACE, Robert P. J. Day |
| Previous by Thread: | [Bug 819] New: 2.6.29.1: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1599, bugzilla-daemon |
| Next by Thread: | bad reference to CONFIG_XFS_TRACE, Robert P. J. Day |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |