Re: [Fwd: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]

[Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry my bad.

oss is now back running on the old hardware but with sles10sp2 as the 
base. (finally)
The aliases.db files were out of date with the new version of sendmail so
it was rejecting emails send to address in the aliases file.

Fixed now.

Also note: bugzilla has been ungraded to the latest stable release (3.2)

Please check things out and let me know if anything else is not 
functioning correctly.

Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> Russ,
>
> Mails to xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx are bouncing.  Any idea what's going on?
>
> Lachlan
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:     Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
> Date:     Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:29:36 -0600
> From:     Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
> To:     ^Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>
> CC:     Gary Hagensen <gwh@xxxxxxx>
> References:     <20090122002647.9698570001C8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> Lachlan, Mark,
>
> Who is responsible for oss? All my mails to the
> xfs mailing list bounce up. :(
>
> Thanks,
> Felix
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > *From: *MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxx <mailto:MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxx> (Mail 
> > Delivery System)
> > *Date: *January 21, 2009 6:26:47 PM CST
> > *To: *felixb@xxxxxxx <mailto:felixb@xxxxxxx>
> > *Subject: **Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender*
> >
> > This is the Postfix program at host estes.americas.sgi.com.
> >
> > I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be
> > be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
> >
> > For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
> >
> > If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> > delete your own text from the attached returned message.
> >
> > The Postfix program
> >
> > <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>>: host 
> > relay.sgi.com[137.38.102.111] said: 550 5.1.1
> >    <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>>: Recipient address 
> > rejected: undeliverable address: host
> >    oss.sgi.com[192.48.182.195] said: 550 5.1.1 <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> > <mailto:xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>>... User
> >    unknown (in reply to RCPT TO command) (in reply to RCPT TO command)
> > Reporting-MTA: dns; estes.americas.sgi.com
> > X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 5F007700016A
> > X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; felixb@xxxxxxx <mailto:felixb@xxxxxxx>
> > Arrival-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:26:44 -0600 (CST)
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822; xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 5.0.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host relay.sgi.com[137.38.102.111] said: 
> > 550 5.1.1
> >    <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>>: Recipient address 
> > rejected: undeliverable address: host
> >    oss.sgi.com[192.48.182.195] said: 550 5.1.1 <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> > <mailto:xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>>... User
> >    unknown (in reply to RCPT TO command) (in reply to RCPT TO command)
> >
> > *From: *Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx <mailto:felixb@xxxxxxx>>
> > *Date: *January 21, 2009 6:26:44 PM CST
> > *To: *Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx <mailto:felixb@xxxxxxx>>
> > *Cc: *xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > *Subject: **Re: [PATCH] [XFS] Warn on transaction in flight on 
> > read-only remount*
> >
> > Just wanted to point out to discussion on this topic:
> >
> > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00019.html
> >
> > I merely took a suggestion from it, and put it in a patch.
> >
> > Felix
> >
> > On Jan 21, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Felix Blyakher wrote:
> >
> > > Till VFS can correctly support read-only remount without racing,
> > > use WARN_ON instead of BUG_ON on detecting transaction in flight
> > > after quiescing filesystem.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c |    5 ++++-
> > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
> > > index 2ed0353..d8373ee 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
> > > @@ -371,7 +371,10 @@ xfs_quiesce_attr(
> > > /* flush inodes and push all remaining buffers out to disk */
> > > xfs_quiesce_fs(mp);
> > >
> > > - ASSERT_ALWAYS(atomic_read(&mp->m_active_trans) == 0);
> > > + /* Just warn here till VFS can correctly support
> > > + * read-only remount without racing.
> > > + */
> > > + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&mp->m_active_trans) == 0);
> > >
> > > /* Push the superblock and write an unmount record */
> > > error = xfs_log_sbcount(mp, 1);
> > > --
> > > 1.6.1