xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure

To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:47:54 +1100
Cc: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20081105132000.4e560cad.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20081030132324.0d619fdd.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081030090832.GQ17077@disturbed> <20081105132000.4e560cad.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 01:20:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:08:32 +1100 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:23:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > 
> > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> > > 
> > > ERROR: "inode_wait" [fs/xfs/xfs.ko] undefined!
> > > 
> > > Caused by commit 676a7711ee281c3bf41db18e29e296584de82793 ("[XFS] Fix
> > > race when looking up reclaimable inodes") which introduced a use of
> > > wait_on_inode() which is an inline that calls inode_wait().
> > 
> > Putting a non-exported symbol in an inline function in a header file
> > that is full of exported functions.  That's pretty anti-social. ;)
> > 
> > > I applied the following patch (probably wrong :-)).
> > 
> > I think it's probably the only solution - we need to wait until
> > the I_LOCK bit is cleared from the inode and AFAICT wait_on_inode()
> > is the only way to do it.
> 
> Any resolution?

I was waiting on a comment from Christoph. I'll cc him directly this
time ;)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>