| To: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.27: "array subscript is above array bounds" warnings |
| From: | Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Oct 2008 11:00:06 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Oliver Bock <bock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20081017235046.f3c6c86e.akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > (cc's added) > > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:17:36 +0200 Oliver Bock <bock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > FYI, I just came across the following warnings when compiling 2.6.27 > > (release) using gcc 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1) on Debian Lenny (i386): ... > > drivers/usb/core/hcd.c: In function ___usb_hcd_poll_rh_status___: > > include/asm/string_32.h:75: warning: array subscript is above array bounds Does this refer to the call to memcpy() in usb_hcd_poll_rh_status()? Line 75 in string_32.h is part of the __constant_memcpy() function. That function should not be involved here because the length argument isn't a compile-time constant. This has to be either a compiler bug or else a bug in the implementation of memcpy. Alan Stern |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.27: "array subscript is above array bounds" warnings, Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [xfs-masters] [Bug 11805] New: mounting XFS produces a segfault, bugme-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.27: "array subscript is above array bounds" warnings, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | [xfs-masters] [Bug 11805] New: mounting XFS produces a segfault, bugme-daemon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |