| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2) |
| From: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:26:10 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20080716071922.GA16777@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <20080624175612.cdf29651.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080624171809.42bbdf68.randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080625003751.GP29319@disturbed> <20080627132317.GB23854@xxxxxx> <20080716071922.GA16777@xxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:23:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> The tree is still messed up. This original [XFS] commit is still there, >> but also a revert of it. but no patch with the actual changes again (?) >> >> Also my patch to switch to the generic xattr code is attributed to >> Lachlan and appears twice in the commit list. I think this whole git >> tree needs to be regenerated. > > Could this please get fixed before the 2.6.27 pull? The xfs.git tree > now has Linus' latest changes pulled but this still doesn't look > fixed up. Yep, I believe Lachlan is planning to regenerate the xfs git tree before the pull request. --Tim |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2), Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2), Stephen Rothwell |
| Previous by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2), Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2), Stephen Rothwell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |