xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: vfs merge failure

from [Al Viro] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: vfs merge failure
From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:25:27 +0000
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080326055521.GJ108924158@xxxxxxx>
References: <20080326160651.7c1b10ae.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080326052335.GO10722@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080326055521.GJ108924158@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i 
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 04:55:21PM +1100, David Chinner wrote:

> That's probably easiest - the XFS change is a trivial cleanup and is
> self contained. The xfs_ioctl() function itself doesn't change, it's
> just been moved to avoid needing 7 or 8 forward declarations....

Alas, not quite...  Needs 50ed1cf6950b5787d7cad811055b7fe2bf47de01 first.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: vfs merge failure, David Chinner
Next by Date:  [xfs-masters] [Bug 6772] truncate() updates timestamps even if file size does not change, bugme-daemon
Previous by Thread:  [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: vfs merge failure, David Chinner
Next by Thread:  [xfs-masters] [Bug 6772] truncate() updates timestamps even if file size does not change, bugme-daemon
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]