On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 05:23:35AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 04:06:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Al, Dave,
> > In merging your vfs tree today, I get a conflict between commit
> > 9e57c9b50551a21e056fea654b3aac5db7c33ec9 ("[PATCH] r/o bind mounts:
> > elevate write count for ioctls()") and commit
> > c657925dc0057ed2ec0db845a1a4f56651adfe39 ("[XFS] The forward declarations
> > for the xfs_ioctl() helpers and the") in the xfs tree. Basically the
> > whole xfs_ioctl function has been moved by the latter commit while Dave's
> > patch modifies it slightly.
> > I have fixed it up for today and am not really sure what we can do about
> > it (hopefully git-rerere will fix it for me from now on, so I can carry
> > it, but it will conflict when merged into Linus' tree).
> I'll probably cherry-pick XFS changeset in question, if it's self-contained
> enough, and put it in front of ro-bind series. Ought to resolve the
> conflict and I have no hestitation about reordering/rebasing.
That's probably easiest - the XFS change is a trivial cleanup and is
self contained. The xfs_ioctl() function itself doesn't change, it's
just been moved to avoid needing 7 or 8 forward declarations....
SGI Australian Software Group