xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: today's xfs tree did not merge cleanly

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: today's xfs tree did not merge cleanly
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:48:50 +1100
Cc: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080215164058.GA2607@xxxxxx>
References: <20080215175403.2bae27cf.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080215164058.GA2607@xxxxxx>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:40:58 +0100 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 05:54:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have included the conflict diff below.  I fixed up the merge by
> > removing fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 and using the be32_add_cpu routine
> > (rather than be32_add).
> 
> What tree is the Makefile change coming from?
The removal of fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 conflicts with a change
to this file in Linus' tree since it was last merged into the XFS tree (I
think). See commit 613d70436c1aeda6843ca8b70c7fab6d0484a591.  This change
actually appears in both trees.

I don't actually understand why these conflict but there was nothing in
any of the other trees that touch that file. I would have thought git's
merge was smarter than that.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHtms5TgG2atn1QN8RAsamAJ9HddU0tYaHtG/KzVjuIvCU5EY7BwCggfMa
a5Syv+2Tdun3tyhg9udOfhk=
=jRaG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>