xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer

To: nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:15:05 +0100
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@xxxxxxx>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <477CB075.5080507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Novell
References: <4744FD87.7010301@xxxxxxxx> <200801031047.58559.oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> <477CB075.5080507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012)
Am Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2008 10:52:53 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
> Hi.
> 
> Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag 03 Januar 2008 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
> >> On top of this, I made a (too simple at the moment) freeze_filesystems
> >> function which iterates through &super_blocks in reverse order, freezing
> >> fuse filesystems or ordinary ones. I say 'too simple' because it doesn't
> >> currently allow for the possibility of someone mounting (say) ext3 on
> >> fuse, but that would just be an extension of what's already done.
> > 
> > How do you deal with fuse server tasks using other fuse filesystems?
> 
> Since they're frozen in reverse order, the dependant one would be frozen
> first.

Say I do:

a) mount fuse on /tmp/first
b) mount fuse on /tmp/second

Then the server task for (a) does "ls /tmp/second". So it will be frozen,
right? How do you then freeze (a)? And keep in mind that the server task
may have forked.

        Regards
                Oliver


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>