| To: | Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer |
| From: | Nigel Cunningham <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:52:53 +1100 |
| Cc: | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@xxxxxxx>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200801031047.58559.oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4744FD87.7010301@xxxxxxxx> <200801022304.19279.rjw@xxxxxxx> <477CA8A8.2090201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200801031047.58559.oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) |
Hi.
Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 03 Januar 2008 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
>> On top of this, I made a (too simple at the moment) freeze_filesystems
>> function which iterates through &super_blocks in reverse order, freezing
>> fuse filesystems or ordinary ones. I say 'too simple' because it doesn't
>> currently allow for the possibility of someone mounting (say) ext3 on
>> fuse, but that would just be an extension of what's already done.
>
> How do you deal with fuse server tasks using other fuse filesystems?
Since they're frozen in reverse order, the dependant one would be frozen
first.
> How does freeze_filesystems() look?
Removing my ugly debugging statements, it's currently:
/**
* freeze_filesystems - lock all filesystems and force them into a
consistent
* state
*/
void freeze_filesystems(int which)
{
struct super_block *sb;
lockdep_off();
/*
* Freeze in reverse order so filesystems dependant upon others are
* frozen in the right order (eg. loopback on ext3).
*/
list_for_each_entry_reverse(sb, &super_blocks, s_list) {
if (sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_IS_FUSE &&
sb->s_frozen == SB_UNFROZEN &&
which & FS_FREEZER_FUSE) {
sb->s_frozen = SB_FREEZE_TRANS;
sb->s_flags |= MS_FROZEN;
continue;
}
if (!sb->s_root || !sb->s_bdev ||
(sb->s_frozen == SB_FREEZE_TRANS) ||
(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) ||
(sb->s_flags & MS_FROZEN) ||
!(which & FS_FREEZER_NORMAL))
continue;
freeze_bdev(sb->s_bdev);
sb->s_flags |= MS_FROZEN;
}
lockdep_on();
}
Nigel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer, Oliver Neukum |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer, Oliver Neukum |
| Previous by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer, Oliver Neukum |
| Next by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer, Oliver Neukum |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |