| To: | Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer |
| From: | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:40:24 +0100 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20071127053846.GA28884@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4744FD87.7010301@xxxxxxxx> <200711262253.35420.rjw@xxxxxxx> <20071127053846.GA28884@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) |
On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:53:34PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote: > > > So how do you handle threads that are blocked on I/O or a lock during > > > the system freeze process, then? > > > > We wait until they can continue. > > So if I have a process blocked on an unavilable NFS mount, I can't > suspend? That's correct, you can't. [And I know what you're going to say. ;-)] Greetings, Rafael |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [xfs-masters] [Bug 6957] Oops with fil with holes, bugme-daemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer, Kyle Moffett |
| Previous by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer, Matthew Garrett |
| Next by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer, Kyle Moffett |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |