xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] Re: [patch] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW

To: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: [patch] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:33:32 -0700
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dean gaudet <dean@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Morten@xxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bøgeskov <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20071023124137.GP66820511@xxxxxxx>
References: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710212015430.2320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <471C1A61.1010001@xxxxxxxx> <p73sl439s7k.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <471CEEB4.9040807@xxxxxxxx> <20071022190740.GA1695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071022223224.GC995458@xxxxxxx> <20071022233514.GA9057@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071023003641.GF995458@xxxxxxx> <20071023070414.GM66820511@xxxxxxx> <20071023093035.GB24536@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071023124137.GP66820511@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727)
David Chinner wrote:
> Nick, Jeremy, (others?) any objections to this approach to solve
> the problem?

Seems sounds in principle.   I think Nick's shootdown-stray-mappings mm
API call is a better long-term answer, but this will do for now.  I'll
test it out today.

    J


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>