xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings

To: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:11:58 -0700
Cc: dean gaudet <dean@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Morten@xxxxxxx, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bøgeskov <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20071022190740.GA1695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <470FA7C3.90404@xxxxxxxx> <20071014225618.GN23367404@xxxxxxx> <4712A254.4090604@xxxxxxxx> <200710151415.07248.nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710212015430.2320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <471C1A61.1010001@xxxxxxxx> <p73sl439s7k.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <471CEEB4.9040807@xxxxxxxx> <20071022190740.GA1695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727)
Andi Kleen wrote:
> It's hidden now so it causes any obvious failures any more. Just
> subtle ones which is much worse.
>   

I think anything detected by Xen is still classed as "obscure" ;)

> But why not just disable it?  It's not critical functionality,
> just a optimization that unfortunately turned out to be incorrect.
>
> It could be made correct short term by not freeing the pages until
> vunmap for example.
>   

I think it only ends up holding 64 pages (or is it 64 mappings?), so its
not a horrible use of memory.  Particularly since it responds to memory
pressure callbacks.

>> does his grand unified vmap manager.  I guess a clean workaround would
>> be to add a CONFIG_XFS_LAZY_UNMAP, and do it at the Kconfig level... 
>> I'll cook up a patch.
>>     
>
> This option could only be safely set in architectures that don't
> care about caching attribute aliases or never remap kernel pages
> uncached. That's not x86, powerpc, ia64 at a minimum.
>
> I think the only good short term fix is to turn your ifdef CONFIG_XEN
> into a #if 0
>   

#if 1, but yes, I see your point.

    J


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>