xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] Re: [RFC][PATCH] XFS: memory leak in xfs_inactive() - is x

To: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: [RFC][PATCH] XFS: memory leak in xfs_inactive() - is xfs_trans_free() enough or do we need xfs_trans_cancel() ?
From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:03:16 +0200
Cc: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WJFZDOqC3iYkUm+J001TLQLVep3W86QhAY4C2WZgqv82A18ydqcPGR+zHDHKY8v8wjlkiW6naq18dnJ7Q0fiMbuJZXc8YRDmUkaGUUW80e58KCchRP7lP8ODoIZoFahoYJ46/lb83rCoPU6vzk2G+nqwFOKX7Zud8+cgqbYBf2g=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tImk3Z6aVfqxqyiMaTU/7i1Ch/8+Y+akhk7wxG01bP9Qh+bWmTdCiK4bqERbgCI1d8Lzbet6q0Z0dwriFtkK8GINVL1i29IXlVKbQKkL8LY0ad7WKlMyU4YeGH3vM9cz3m0zZTfR7TI8Oc0S9RpCH8/lZ2KzsPGKhI1q5dmkKck=
In-reply-to: <200705180053.56070.jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <200705162331.16429.jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx> <20070517024024.GT85884050@xxxxxxx> <200705180053.56070.jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Any chance the patches below that fix two mem leaks in XFS will make
it in in time for 2.6.22? I believe they should...

On 18/05/07, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 17 May 2007 04:40:24 David Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:31:16PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The Coverity checker found a memory leak in xfs_inactive().
> > ....
> > > So, the code allocates a transaction, but in the case where 'truncate' is
> > > !=0 and xfs_itruncate_start(ip, XFS_ITRUNC_DEFINITE, 0); happens to return
> > > an error, we'll just return from the function without dealing with the
> > > memory allocated byxfs_trans_alloc() and assigned to 'tp', thus it'll be
> > > orphaned/leaked - not good.
> >
> > Yeah, introduced by:
> >
> > http://git2.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d3cf209476b72c83907a412b6708c5e498410aa7
> >
> > Thanks for reporting the problem, Jesper.
> >
> You are welcome.
>
> That commit introduces the same problem in xfs_inactive_free_eofblocks().
> Patch to fix it below.
>
> > > What I'm wondering is this; is it enough, at this point, to call
> > > xfs_trans_free(tp); (it would seem to me that would be OK, but I'm not
> > > intimite with this code) or do we need a full xfs_trans_cancel(tp, 0);  
> > > ???
> >
> > xfs_trans_free() is not supposed to be called by anything but the 
> > transaction
> > code (it's static). So a xfs_trans_cancel() would need to be issued.
> >
> Makes sense. Thanks. I completely missed the static nature :-/
>
>
>
> Fix XFS memory leak; allocated transaction not freed in 
> xfs_inactive_free_eofblocks() in failure case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
> index de17aed..32519cf 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
> @@ -1260,6 +1260,7 @@ xfs_inactive_free_eofblocks(
>                 error = xfs_itruncate_start(ip, XFS_ITRUNC_DEFINITE,
>                                     ip->i_size);
>                 if (error) {
> +                       xfs_trans_cancel(tp, 0);
>                         xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
>                         return error;
>                 }
>
>

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>