xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[xfs-masters] Re: it seems at XFS bug?!

from [Willy Tarreau] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: it seems at XFS bug?!
From: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:21:08 +0200
Cc: oliver pinter <oliver.pntr@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705201038250.9015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6101e8c40705191117h40c8af70sfc9d0617a99a248b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1HpUNW-00020n-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070519192021.GK943@xxxxxx> <20070519192246.GA11733@xxxxxx> <6101e8c40705191237v46939bf1i7098fc974784de5a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6101e8c40705191250o447e9c59kba824baae4d99b3f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070519202419.GC2521@xxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705201038250.9015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11 
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:39:33AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> On May 19 2007 22:24, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 09:50:43PM +0200, oliver pinter wrote:
> >> yeah, but how produziert?
> >
> >I *think* it is the unbreakable space.
> 
> \xa0 is 160, aka the NBSP. But __only__ in ISO-8859. It is an invalid
> UTF-8 sequence (which is why you may not even "see" the nbsp :-)

An even better reason is to be in ISO-8859 :-)

Willy
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [xfs-masters] Re: [2/5] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions, Maurice van der Pot
Next by Date:  [xfs-masters] Re: it seems at XFS bug?!, Jan Engelhardt
Previous by Thread:  [xfs-masters] Re: it seems at XFS bug?!, Jan Engelhardt
Next by Thread:  [xfs-masters] Re: it seems at XFS bug?!, Andreas Schwab
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]