xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] Re: How many people are using 2.6.16?

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: How many people are using 2.6.16?
From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:49:35 +1100
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Lord <lkml@xxxxxx>, Bron Gondwana <brong@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Houston <mikeserv@xxxxxxxx>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve French <smfltc@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Drake <dsd@xxxxxxxxxx>, samba-technical@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vladimir Saveliev <vs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, reiserfs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070131070237.GT3754@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <45BE5948.6060403@xxxxxxxxxx> <20070129160448.65fc63f3.mikeserv@xxxxxxxx> <20070129221300.GC19422@xxxxxxxxx> <20070130203933.GJ3754@xxxxxxxxx> <45BFF1F4.3060401@xxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701301748230.3611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070131070237.GT3754@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:02:37AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > The issue was somewhat confused by people certainly *reporting* it for 
> > older kernels. Also, as part of the dirty bit cleanups and sanity 
> > checkingwe did actually seem to fix a long-standing CIFS corruption (and 
> > apparently reisertfs/XFS problems too).
> > 
> > But the *common* case was actually introduced with 2.6.19, and 2.6.16 
> > wouldn't be affected. 
> 
> Thanks for the clarifications.
> 
> Regarding the longstanding CIFS/reiserfs/XFS problems, it seems the 
> status is:
....
> XFS:
> fix not yet in your tree

With the WARN_ON() in cancel_dirty_page() removed:

http://git2.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=ecdfc9787fe527491baefc22dce8b2dbd5b2908d

XFS will behave exactly the same as 2.6.19 and previous releases.
The patches I sent were only ever really workarounds to greatly
reduce the race window that could lead to the warning being
triggered.

We really need Nick Piggin's invalidate/truncate/mmap race fixes to
properly solve the XFS issues uncovered by Linus' changes. Given
that we haven't had any reported cases of data corruption on XFS
(and I couldn't trigger any even when seeing the warnings) I think
we are fairly safe just maintaining the status quo and waiting the
right fix to make it's way into the tree....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>