On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:39:42AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> - unquoted
>
> While doing the C99 conversion I notices that the top level sh64
> directory was using the binary number for CTL_KERN. That is a
> no-no so I removed the support for the sysctl binary interface
> only leaving sysctl /proc support.
>
> At least the sysctl tables were placed at the end of
> the list so user space did not see this mistake.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good, thanks Eric.
Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
|