xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] [PATCH 0/59] Cleanup sysctl

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] [PATCH 0/59] Cleanup sysctl
From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:33:47 -0700
Cc: <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Containers <containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx, minyard@xxxxxxx, openipmi-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx, heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx, linux390@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-390@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulus@xxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxx, lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx, lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxsh-shmedia-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, <ak@xxxxxxx>, vojtech@xxxxxxx, clemens@xxxxxxxxxx, a.zummo@xxxxxxxxxxxx, rtc-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrea@xxxxxxx, tim@xxxxxxxxxxxx, philb@xxxxxxx, aharkes@xxxxxxxxxx, coda@xxxxxxxxxx, codalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aia21@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-ntfs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
There has not been much maintenance on sysctl in years, and as a result is
there is a lot to do to allow future interesting work to happen, and being
ambitious I'm trying to do it all at once :)

The patches in this series fall into several general categories.

- Removal of useless attempts to override the standard sysctls

- Registers of sysctl numbers in sysctl.h so someone else does not use
  the magic number and conflict.

- C99 conversions so it becomes possible to change the layout of 
  struct ctl_table without breaking everything.

- Removal of useless claims of module ownership, in the proc dir entries

- Removal of sys_sysctl support where people had used conflicting sysctl
  numbers. Trying to break glibc or other applications by changing the
  ABI is not cool.  9 instances of this in the kernel seems a little
  extreme.

- General enhancements when I got the junk I could see out.

Odds are I missed something, most of the cleanups are simply a result of
me working on the sysctl core and glancing at the users and going: What?

Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>