xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm2

To: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm2
From: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:43:32 +0200
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VLdkCJagbFWqQC4burgukXbpKyz5knieFBUy/F+y7FqxO1N/J4QK+RLTtvNKCa5ZH00hrfdL1aixLhDlWL4muC2aE4/4XTSQGgaBK4t/BIoHBjw306pTwxwqBdpj3ycinMGMaefCrcfDK6+2+0qK/zA6fsPvGYZdDydgN0P7bdM=
In-reply-to: <20060913042627.GE3024@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20060912000618.a2e2afc0.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <6bffcb0e0609120554j5e69e2sd2c8ebb914c4c9f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bffcb0e0609120842s6a38b326u4e1fff2e562a6832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060912162555.d71af631.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <6bffcb0e0609121634l7db1808cwa33601a6628ee7eb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060912163749.27c1e0db.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20060913015850.GB3034@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060913042627.GE3024@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 13/09/06, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:58:50AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> > Call Trace:
> > [<c013ae74>] lock_release_non_nested+0xd8/0x143
> > [<c013b291>] lock_release+0x178/0x19f
> > [<c02f7dc5>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xbb/0x131
> > [<c02f7e43>] mutex_unlock+0x8/0xa
> > [<c017655f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x9c/0xd9
> > [<c01765bc>] kill_block_super+0x20/0x32
> > [<c017667c>] deactivate_super+0x5d/0x6f
> > [<c01892bc>] mntput_no_expire+0x52/0x85
> > [<c017b2c9>] path_release_on_umount+0x15/0x18
> > [<c018a469>] sys_umount+0x1e1/0x215
> > [<c018a4aa>] sys_oldumount+0xd/0xf
> > [<c0103156>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
> >
> > I'm not sure why XFS would cause this - the crash is outside XFS releasing
> > a mutex (sb->s_lock) that XFS code has never touched. I doubt anyone
> > in the XFS team has done any testing on this -mm kernel...
> >
> > What is the test case, Michal? Can you post the script you used?
>
> I've booted 2.6.18-rc6-mm2 and mounted and unmounted several xfs
> filesystems. I'm currently running xfsqa on it, and I haven't seen
> any failures on unmount yet.
>
> That test case would be really handy, Michal.

http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.18-rc6-mm2/test_mount_fs.sh

ls -hs /home/fs-farm/
total 3.6G
513M ext2.img  513M ext4.img  513M reiser3.img  513M xfs.img
513M ext3.img  513M jfs.img   513M reiser4.img

>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> Principal Engineer
> SGI Australian Software Group
>

Regards,
Michal

-- 
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>