[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc2 - notifier chain problem?

To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc2 - notifier chain problem?
From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:48:02 -0700
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, ashok.raj@xxxxxxxxx, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604281632150.3701@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: IBM
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0604261144010.6376-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1146075534.24650.11.camel@linuxchandra> <20060426114348.51e8e978.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20060426122926.A31482@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1146082893.24650.27.camel@linuxchandra> <20060426132644.A31761@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1146265920.7063.133.camel@linuxchandra> <20060428162302.79926325.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604281632150.3701@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 16:33 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > hm.  I'm leaning more towards doing something expedient and obvious for
> > 2.6.17.  It's pretty late in the cycle, and the only downside is the loss
> > of a kbyte or two.  Plus I'll be at linuxtag next week and won't be around 
> > to
> > help out.
> > 
> > So if it's OK, can we do something minimal, revisit it after 2.6.17?
> I'm personally fine with the current state: it should be stable and work.

in that case _no_ change would be the best option.

> If there are any remaining _bugs_ that people know about, please send 
> fixes to me, but I think we can definitely leave the "free the unnecessary

No bugs that i know of.
> memory" stuff to after 2.6.17.

sounds good.
>               Linus

    Chandra Seetharaman               | Be careful what you choose....
              - sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx   |      .......you may get it.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>