[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc2 - notifier chain problem?

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc2 - notifier chain problem?
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx, ashok.raj@xxxxxxxxx, stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060428162302.79926325.akpm@xxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0604261144010.6376-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1146075534.24650.11.camel@linuxchandra> <20060426114348.51e8e978.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20060426122926.A31482@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1146082893.24650.27.camel@linuxchandra> <20060426132644.A31761@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1146265920.7063.133.camel@linuxchandra> <20060428162302.79926325.akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> hm.  I'm leaning more towards doing something expedient and obvious for
> 2.6.17.  It's pretty late in the cycle, and the only downside is the loss
> of a kbyte or two.  Plus I'll be at linuxtag next week and won't be around to
> help out.
> So if it's OK, can we do something minimal, revisit it after 2.6.17?

I'm personally fine with the current state: it should be stable and work. 
If there are any remaining _bugs_ that people know about, please send 
fixes to me, but I think we can definitely leave the "free the unnecessary 
memory" stuff to after 2.6.17.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>