Resend, previous mail was missing the person who reported the problem.
Nathan Scott (on Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:35:33 +1000) wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:21:45AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>> [ 39.585041] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
>> address 7856c380
>> [ 39.586688] printing eip:
>> [ 39.587040] 78129430
>> [ 39.587354] *pde = 005bf027
>> [ 39.587709] *pte = 0056c000
>> [ 39.588201] Oops: 0000 [#1]
>> [ 39.588536] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
>> [ 39.589057] Modules linked in:
>> [ 39.589639] CPU: 0
>> [ 39.589670] EIP: 0060:[<78129430>] Not tainted VLI
>> [ 39.589710] EFLAGS: 00000206 (2.6.17-rc1 #1)
>> [ 39.591291] EIP is at notifier_chain_register+0x20/0x50
>> [ 39.591890] eax: 7856c378 ebx: 878db3f8 ecx: 00000000 edx: 784bf9bc
>> [ 39.592601] esi: 878db3f8 edi: 878e7c00 ebp: 878db800 esp: 878cad5c
>> [ 39.593399] ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
>> [ 39.593896] Process mount (pid: 50, threadinfo=878ca000 task=87f7e570)
>> [ 39.594530] Stack: <0>784bf9a0 781295f4 784bf9bc 878db3f8 878db000
>> 878db000 78136997 784bf9a0
>> [ 39.595839] 878db3f8 782d43e6 878db3f8 00000404 878db000 87d1e6a0
>> 878e7c00 782d1813
>> [ 39.597002] 878db000 00000001 782e5eaf 00000424 00000001 878e7c00
>> 87d1e6a0 782f2150
>> [ 39.598164] Call Trace:
>> [ 39.598592] <781295f4> blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x54/0x90
>> <78136997> register_cpu_notifier+0x17/0x20
>> [ 39.600024] <782d43e6> xfs_icsb_init_counters+0x46/0xb0 <782d1813>
>> xfs_mount_init+0x23/0x160
>> [ 39.601199] <782e5eaf> kmem_zalloc+0x1f/0x50 <782f2150>
>> bhv_insert_all_vfsops+0x10/0x50
>> [ 39.602315] <782f1835> xfs_fs_fill_super+0x35/0x1f0 <78313607>
>> snprintf+0x27/0x30
>> [ 39.603437] <781a2134> disk_name+0x64/0xc0 <78168fbf>
>> sb_set_blocksize+0x1f/0x50
>> [ 39.604524] <78168909> get_sb_bdev+0x109/0x160 <781445ef>
>> __alloc_pages+0x5f/0x370
>> [ 39.605612] <782f1a20> xfs_fs_get_sb+0x30/0x40 <782f1800>
>> xfs_fs_fill_super+0x0/0x1f0
>> [ 39.606698] <78168bb0> do_kern_mount+0xa0/0x160 <78181467>
>> do_new_mount+0x77/0xc0
>> [ 39.607764] <78181b2f> do_mount+0x1bf/0x220 <783f4178>
>> iret_exc+0x3d4/0x6ab
>> [ 39.608790] <78181913> copy_mount_options+0x63/0xc0 <783f398f>
>> lock_kernel+0x2f/0x50
>> [ 39.609867] <78181f2f> sys_mount+0x9f/0xe0 <78102b27>
>> syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>> [ 39.610923] Code: 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 53 8b 54 24 08 8b 5c
>> 24 0c 8b 02 85 c0 74 31 8b 4b 08 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00
>> <3b> 48 08 7f 1b 8d 50 04 8b 40 04 85 c0 75 f1 31 c0 eb 0d 90 90
Ignoring the leading NOPs, that decodes to
0: 53 push %ebx
1: 8b 54 24 08 mov 0x8(%esp,1),%edx
5: 8b 5c 24 0c mov 0xc(%esp,1),%ebx
9: 8b 02 mov (%edx),%eax
b: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
d: 74 31 je 0x40
f: 8b 4b 08 mov 0x8(%ebx),%ecx
12: 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%esi,1),%esi
19: 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%edi,1),%edi
20: 3b 48 08 cmp 0x8(%eax),%ecx <==== oops
23: 7f 1b jg 0x40
25: 8d 50 04 lea 0x4(%eax),%edx
28: 8b 40 04 mov 0x4(%eax),%eax
2b: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
2d: 75 f1 jne 0x20
2f: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
31: eb 0d jmp 0x40
static int notifier_chain_register(struct notifier_block **nl,
struct notifier_block *n)
{
while ((*nl) != NULL) {
if (n->priority > (*nl)->priority) <=== oops
break;
nl = &((*nl)->next);
}
n->next = *nl;
rcu_assign_pointer(*nl, n);
return 0;
}
notifier_chain_register() is running the existing chain to find the
place where XFS needs to be inserted, and the existing chain is
corrupt. Probably not an XFS problem.
Any particular reason why this kernel is using VMSPLIT_2G?
|