| To: | Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [xfs-masters] Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks |
| From: | Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:50:56 -0500 |
| Cc: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, nathans@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20051216004740.GV23349@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, nathans@xxxxxxx |
| References: | <20051215212447.GR23349@xxxxxxxxx> <20051215140013.7d4ffd5b.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20051215223000.GU23349@xxxxxxxxx> <20051215231538.GF3419@xxxxxxxxxx> <20051216004740.GV23349@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:47:40AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > [*] Plus a few XFS ones, but that's been a lost cause wrt stack usage
> > for a long time -- people were reporting overflows there before we
> > enabled 4K stacks.
>
> I remember someone from the XFS maintainers (Nathan?) saying they
> believe having solved all XFS stack issues.
>
> If there are any XFS issues left, do you have a pointer to them?
The last one I saw may have been actually been more related
to the block layer problem. iirc that was a user NFS exporting
XFS on a raid1 array.
Dave
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks, Adrian Bunk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks, Neil Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks, Adrian Bunk |
| Next by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks, Neil Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |