| To: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [xfs-masters] Re: potential xfs_repair bug |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:18:43 -0500 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.44.0409271350210.19241-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.44.0409271350210.19241-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040803) |
Junfeng Yang wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > I sent the follow report out at the beginning of this month. The report > is about that xfs_repair creates lost+found every time it runs, even on a > clean file system, and if crash happens while lost+found is created, the > root directory goes corrupted. It looks like making xfs_repair crash-safe > is hard. However, I'm wondering if you guys have fixed the creating > lost+found even on a clean fs part. I guess that's not really considered a bug at this point... although I'd like to change the behavior someday, it's not a very high priority, I think. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: potential xfs_repair bug, Junfeng Yang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [xfs-masters] XFS Support on RH EL 3.0, Sean Constantine |
| Previous by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: potential xfs_repair bug, Junfeng Yang |
| Next by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: List, tourism |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |